Saga Oracle / Decision inspection

See the path to a decision.

Inspect the evidence, findings and convergent outcomes behind a decision. Understand what was considered, where reviews differ and who is responsible for accepting the result.

Make the decision process inspectable.

Saga Oracle is the inspection surface for decisions. Its broader workbench direction connects the original intent to evidence, evaluations and the authorized outcome. The asset-trading workflow is its first application.

01

Context and evidence

Follow the question, requirements and sources behind an assessment, along with the outputs and checks presented for review.

02

Findings and disagreement

Compare assessments, see where they agree or differ, and retain unresolved gaps rather than lose them in a summary.

03

Outcome and responsibility

Understand which criteria were applied, who reviewed the result and which authority accepted it—or asked for more work.

Convergence / Multi-party review

Bring different parties to a reviewable decision.

Convergence is the decision process. In the broader work-review model, parties agree the scope and review criteria, evaluate the submitted outputs independently, and compare findings under declared rules. Disagreement can return for resolution and retesting. Agreement supports a decision; acceptance remains with the designated authority.

A conceptual review process checks agreed rules, compares independent evaluations, routes disagreement for resolution and retesting, and reserves acceptance for a named authority.
  1. Validate inputs against agreed rules.
  2. Compare independent reviews under the declared policy.
  3. Retain disagreement and route it for resolution and retesting.
  4. Keep acceptance with the named authority.
Multi-party work-review concept adapted from the technical overview. The broader process and workbench remain in development; this diagram does not describe a generally available plan-acceptance service.
01

The work owner defines success

Start with the approved scope, requirements and acceptance criteria carried by the plan. Make the review rules and responsible parties explicit.

02

Contributors submit outputs

People or agents present the deliverable and its evidence. Finishing execution is a submission for review, not automatic acceptance.

03

Reviewers assess; authority accepts

Independent parties assess the same outputs against agreed criteria. Retain dissent and revised findings; the authorized reviewer or approving body decides acceptance.

Our first workflow: asset-trading decisions.

Asset trading offers a concrete setting for repeated decisions, observable market inputs and a timestamped operating record. Explore why we started there and how the current workflow connects structural findings, convergent results and governed action.

Take the next step.

Free SagaHalla membership includes the current Saga Oracle app at Validator. Operator and Allocator are paid upgrades. The broader decision workbench is in development; GitLab source access is coming soon.